The Foundations We Depend On (the Publican and the Pharisee)

“When reflecting a little about the diverse circumstances of life, it is worthwhile to seriously comprehend the foundations we depend upon.

One person depends upon their position, another on money, someone else on their prestige, another person on their past, someone different on this or that particular academic degree, etc.

The most curious thing about this matter is that all of us, whether rich or poor economically, need everyone else and live off everyone else, even if we are filled with pride & vanity.”

Society functions with the help of all those who participate. Each job that contributes to society (regardless of what someone may think of it) helps in the functioning of the social machinery.

“…no honest job deserves contempt. It is absurd to look disdainfully at a taxi driver, or at a salesperson of the clothing store, or at any farmer, or at a shoeshiner, etc. because every humble job is beautiful, every modest job is necessary in social life.”

“…The “I” or Ego that feels itself to be the foundation that we depend upon must be dissolved if indeed we wish for authentic bliss.

Such an “I” underestimates people, feels it is better than the whole world, more perfect in everything, wealthier, more intelligent, more experienced in life, etc.

It is very opportune to quote the parable of Jesus the Great Kabir, about the two men who went up into the temple to pray.

He spoke this parable to those who felt secure in their self-righteousness and who despised others.

“Two men went up into the temple to pray; one was a Pharisee, and the other a Publican.

The Pharisee standing and praying alone with himself like this: “God, I thank thee that I am not as other men are: thieves, unjust, adulterers, or even as this Publican. I fast twice in the week; I give tithes of all that I possess.’

And the Publican standing afar off would not look up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, ‘God be merciful to me, a sinner.’

I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbled himself shall be exalted.” (LUKE 18: 10-14)

-Paraphrase from Ch 27 of Treatise of Revolutionary Psychology
and from Ch. 7 of Fundamental Education
by Samael Aun Weor


Being “Rich” and the Concept of “More”

“To begin to realize our own nothingness and the misery in which we find ourselves is absolutely impossible as long as that concept of “More” exists within us.

Examples: I am more just than that person, wiser than that fellow, more virtuous than them, richer, more experienced in the things of life, more chaste, more responsible in my duties, etc.

It is not possible to go through the eye of a needle as long as we are “rich”, as long as that complex of “More” exists within us.

“It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle,
than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” (MATTHEW 19:24)

The feeling that “my school is the best and my neighbors school is worthless”; that “my Religion is the only authentic one and that all others religions are false and perverse”; that “so-and-so’s spouse is a lousy spouse and that mine is a saint”; that “my friend Robert is a drunkard, yet, I am wise and abstemious”, etc., is what makes us feel ‘rich’.

Therein is the reason why we are all the “camels” of the biblical parable in relation to the Esoteric Work.

It is urgent to observe ourselves from moment to moment with the purpose of clearly knowing the foundations we depend upon.

-Paraphrase from Ch 27 of Treatise of Revolutionary Psychology
by Samael Aun Weor


The Sands of our Psychological Foundations

“When we discover that which offends us the most
at any given moment,
when someone bothers us
because of one thing or another,
we then discover the foundations
we psychologically depend upon

Such foundations constitute, according to the Christian Gospel,
“the sands upon which we built our house.”

It is necessary to carefully notice when and how much one despises others,
perhaps we feel we are superior
because of our academic degree
or our social position,
or because of our acquired experience or money, etc.

It is terrible to feel ‘rich’,
to feel superior to this or that person
because of one reason or another.

People like this cannot enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.

It is worthwhile to discover what flatters us,
what satisfies our vanity,
[and] this will show us the foundations
that we depend upon.

Nevertheless, such a type of observation
must not be something merely theoretical.
We must be practical
and observe ourselves closely
in a direct way
from instant to instant.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 27 of Treatise of Revolutionary Psychology
by Samael Aun Weor


Comprehending our Position

“When one begins to comprehend their own misery and nothingness,
when one abandons the delirium of grandeur,
when one discovers the foolishness of so many academic degrees, honors
and vain illusions of superiority over our fellow human beings,
then this is an unmistakable sign
that one is beginning to change.

If one clings to that which says:
• “my house,”
• “my money,”
• “my properties,”
• “my job,”
• “my virtues,”
• “my intellectual capacities,”
• “my artistic capacities,”
• “my knowledge,”
• “my prestige,” etc.,
then, one cannot change.

So, clinging to “mine” or to “my” is more than enough
in order to prevent recognition
of our nothingness and interior misery.

One is astonished in front of the spectacle
of a fire or a shipwreck.

At such a moment desperate people often seize many things that are ludicrous,
things of no importance.

Wretched people!

They feel themselves in those objects;
they lean on silly objects;
they become attached to objects,
which do not have the least bit of importance.

To feel that one exists through external things,
and to lay our foundations upon those things
is equivalent to being in a state of total unconsciousness.

The feeling of the “SEITY” (the REAL BEING) is only possible
by dissolving all those “I’s” in our Interior,
before this, such a feeling is more than impossible.

Unfortunately, the adorers of the “I” do not accept this.

They believe themselves to be Gods.

They believe that they already possess those “glorious bodies”
that Paul of Tarsus spoke about.

They assume that the “I” is divine
and no one can erase these absurdities from their heads.

One does not know what to do with such people.

The doctrine is explained to them;
yet, they do not understand it.

They always hold fast to the sands upon which they built their house.

They are always engrossed within their dogmas,
within their whims,
within their foolishness.

If those people were to observe themselves seriously,
then they would verify for themselves
the Doctrine of the Many.

They would discover within themselves
all the multiplicity of persons, Egos or “I’s”
which live within our interior.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 27 of Treatise of Revolutionary Psychology
by Samael Aun Weor


The Feeling we have Within

“How can the real feeling of our true BEING
be experienced within ourselves,
when, instead, those “I’s” or Egos
are feeling for us
and thinking for us?

The most critical part of all this tragedy
is that we think we are thinking
and that we feel we are feeling, when, indeed, it is someone else who (in a given moment) thinks through our tormented mind and feels through our afflicted heart.

Oh, how wretched we are, how many times do we believe we are loving, when what is happening is that another person (filled with lust) is utilizing the heart center.

…we confuse animal passion for love! Nevertheless, it is someone else within us, within our personality, who goes through these confusions.

All of us think that we will never pronounce those words of the Pharisee in the biblical parable: “God, I thank thee that I am not as other men are,” etc.

Nevertheless, and as incredible as it may seem, this is the way we behave every day.

The butcher in the market says,
“I am not like the rest of the butchers
that sell bad quality meat and exploit people.”

The vendor of textiles in the store exclaims,
“I am not like the rest of the merchants
who know how to steal when measuring
and who have grown rich.”

The milk vendor affirms,
“I am not like the rest of the milk vendors
that put water in their milk.
I like to be honest.”

The housewife comments to her visitor the following:
“I am not like such a lady who flirts with other men.
I am, thank God, a decent person,
since I am faithful to my husband.”

Conclusion: Others are scoundrels, unjust, adulterers, thieves and perverse persons;
yet, each one of us is a humble lamb,
“a saint with a golden halo,”
who is worthy to be shown like a golden masterpiece inside any church.

How foolish we are!
We often think that we never do
all the foolishness and perversities
that we see others do;
and this is why we arrive at the conclusion
that we are magnificent persons.
Unfortunately, we do not see the foolishness and wretched things we do.

Unusual moments exist in life when our mind rests without worries of any kind, when the mind is calm, when the mind is in silence. Then, the new arrives.

In such instants, it is possible to see the bases, the foundations we depend upon.

When the mind is in profound interior restfulness,
we can verify for ourselves
the crude reality of the sands of life,
upon which we have built our house.

(Read Matthew 7, Verses 24-29; the parable that talks about the two foundations).

-Paraphrase from Ch 27 of Treatise of Revolutionary Psychology
by Samael Aun Weor


Our Particular Weaknesses

“…at a certain moment in the work,
besides understanding the general principles,
one must try to find one’s own peculiarities
[the particular sands of our life],
since one cannot know oneself (for practical purposes)
if one only knows the general characteristics.

Each person has their own individual features,
their own weaknesses
when they are unable to resist things that happen.

These features or weaknesses
may be very simple
or very complicated.

One person may be able to resist everything except good food;
another everything except ‘good conversation’,
or a person may be lazy or too active.

It is very important (at a certain stage of self-study)
to find one’s chief feature,
which means the chief weakness.

People’s chief weaknesses are very different,
and if we can resist something that another person cannot resist
because it happens to be their chief feature,
this difference in weaknesses gives us the illusion that we can ‘do’
[and that we are ‘better’ than them
because we can resist what they cannot].

Chief feature or chief weakness
is in false personality.

In some cases it is possible to see definitely one, two or three features or tendencies,
often linked together,
which enter into everything like a sort of an axis
around which everything turns.

This is chief feature.

Sometimes it is very clear and apparent,
but sometimes it is difficult to describe.

Our language often has no words, no forms
to describe it
and it can only be indicated in a roundabout way.

Something interesting is that a person can hardly ever find their own chief feature,
because they are in it,
and if they are told,
they usually do not believe it.

But we can find what stands side by side with it,
although that is not it.

It is sometimes useful to collect opinions from friends about oneself,
as this often helps in discovering one’s features.

It is very important to find out
what creates obstacles to our Work.

Until one has found it,
a chief feature means constant loss of energy,
so we must find this leak and stop it.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 7 of The Fourth Way
by Peter Ouspensky


False Personality and Chief Feature

“When you find many manifestations of your false personality,
you may find your chief feature.

…Some may ask: If we find out our chief features,
can we correct them?

Through the Work, by using the results of experience and knowledge
that do not belong to ordinary life,
a person can change.

But, in the ordinary way [that is, without the Work],
a person cannot change.

[…Yet, an ordinary person does change,
their personality may change
their habits may change
their likes and dislikes may change…

But let’s understand that
without the Work
the changes a person goes through
are not the same TYPE of changes
they are not Conscious changes…

Instead, without the work, people typically] become
more mechanical,
more narrow,
more set.

There may be exceptions,
but as a rule
things do not progress in ordinary life.

Personalities change, particularly if circumstances change,
but it is mechanical, accidental change [not a conscious change].

We often base our opinion on exceptions,
whether we observe them rightly or wrongly.

Exceptions are easier to notice than rules.

…Our knowledge of ourselves is very defective.

One can observe many things in life and make great mistakes,
if one does not know how to verify.

And generally, as has been said,
it is difficult to see one’s own chief feature.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 7 of The Fourth Way
by Peter Ouspensky


Attitudes, False Personality and Chief Feature

“In the beginning,
what is important is not the chief feature itself
but what is produced by it,
and which one can study
in the form of attitudes.

We do not know our attitudes
because we have never thought about ourselves in the right way.

We have too many imaginary ideas.

What we must study now is
• all our points of view,
• habitual emotions,
• the way we think,
• what we invent.

These are all results of chief feature or chief features,
for there may be two or three features which are the most important,
not necessarily only one.

For practical purposes,
let us think about false personality…

As a theory, false personality (in most cases)
turns round one axle
and that axle is chief feature.

If a person has one big weakness,
from one point of view this is an advantage,
because if they can conquer this feature or weakness
then they can (in one stride) achieve many things.

It is an advantage when things are concentrated,
many things coming together at one point.

Then efforts at this point produce better results
than if one works at different points.

However, chief feature is not always definable.

Sometimes you can put your finger on it,
sometimes not;
in one person you can see it,
in another not.

But false personality you can see.

…Chief feature is …something upon which false personality is based
and which enters into everything.”

“…one of the best definitions for chief feature is
that it is almost always what makes decisions.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 7 of The Fourth Way
by Peter Ouspensky


Our Features and our Weaknesses

“…The chief feature is chief weakness…”

“…Everyone has one, two or three particular weaknesses,
and everybody has certain buffers that are especially important,
for they enter into all of that person’s decisions
and of their understanding of things.”

“…Buffers are artificial,
and are chiefly acquired by imitation.

Children begin to imitate grown-ups
and create buffers,
and some others are unwittingly created by education.

Features or weaknesses can sometimes be found out,
and if one knows a feature and keeps it in mind,
[then] one may find certain moments
when one can act not from this feature.

Everybody has many features
but two or three are particularly important
because they enter into every subjectively important situation
in one’s life;
everything passes through them,
all perceptions and all reactions.

It is very difficult to realize what this means
because we are so accustomed to it
that we do not notice it;
we are too much in those features,
we have not got enough perspective.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 13 of The Fourth Way
by Peter Ouspensky


Remembering our Mechanicalness, False Personality and Understanding Ourselves

“In connection with chief feature,
it is better to think first on general lines
—why you came to the Work [and type B influences],
what you want from the Esoteric Work.

…We often do not remember about mechanicalness;
we forget about the very keen conviction in every person
that they can ‘do’,
and that if they cannot [‘do’]
it is because they did not think about it
or did not wish to [‘do’ it].

It is necessary to struggle with this idea,
and understand that we are mechanical,
that we cannot ‘do’ [, but instead that everything ‘happens’],
that we are asleep,
that we have many Egos or “I’s”
—all these things.

This will help us to see false personality,
since all these things we ascribe to ourselves
are standard examples of mechanical imagination [or fantasy].

And imaginary personality, or false personality,
is chief feature for everybody.”

“What are the kinds of things to look for
in trying to separate false personality
from the rest of oneself?

Well, it is necessary to understand the features of false personality
—what makes it up.”

“There are strange varieties of chief feature
and there are classical ones.

One very common feature,
described in many places in the New Testament,
is when we see other people’s faults
but not our own.

Then certain kinds of self-pity are very common.

And there are also curious combinations
for which it is sometimes difficult to find a psychological definition.”

“Another predominant aspect of false personality
is blaming other people.

Upon what is this based?
On lack of understanding.

If we begin to study Gnostic Psychology,
we find that all causes are in ourselves;
there can be no causes outside ourselves.

We do not remind ourselves of this often enough.

One little part understands that causes are in us,
but the larger part continues to accuse other people.

At the bottom of every favorite negative emotion
you will find self-justification which feeds it.

We must stop it in our mind first,
and then after some time
we will be able to stop it in the emotion too.

Lack of understanding is the first cause,
lack of effort the second.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 7 of The Fourth Way
by Peter Ouspensky


Struggling Against Chief Feature

“One of the best ways to struggle with false personality is
to always do something which false personality does not like
and very soon you will find more things it does not like.

If you continue, it will get more & more irritated
and will show itself more & more clearly,
so that soon there will be no question about it.

But first your struggle must be based on knowing
—you must know its features,
find what it particularly dislikes.

One false personality dislikes one thing,
another dislikes another thing.”

“[But, in the end, there is only one] …way to defeat chief feature
and that is through self-remembering.

Without self-remembering we can do nothing.
It is the only way.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 7 of The Fourth Way
by Peter Ouspensky


Awakening means De-Hypnotizing Ourselves

“If human beings could really see their true position
and could understand the horror of it all,
[then] they would be unable to remain where they are even for one second.

They would begin to seek a way out
and they would quickly find it,
because there is a way out;
but people fail to see it
simply because they are hypnotized.

The Kundartiguador is the force
that keeps them in a hypnotic state.

‘To awaken’ for people means
to be ‘dehypnotized’.

In this lies the chief difficulty
and in this also lies the guarantee of its possibility,
for there is no organic reason for sleep
and the human being can awaken.

“Theoretically people can,
but practically it is almost impossible
because as soon as a person awakens for a moment
and opens their eyes,
all the forces that caused them to fall asleep
begin to act upon them with ten-fold energy
and they immediately fall asleep again,
very often dreaming that they are awake or are awakening.

“There are certain states in ordinary sleep
in which a person wants to awaken
but cannot.

They tell themselves that they are awake
but, in reality, they continue to sleep
—and this can happen several times
before they finally awaken.

But in ordinary sleep,
once they are awake,
they are in a different state;

in hypnotic sleep
the case is otherwise;
there are no objective characteristics,
at any rate not at the beginning of awakening;
a person cannot pinch themselves
in order to make sure
that they are not asleep.

And if, which God forbid,
a person has heard anything about objective characteristics,
[then] Kundartiguador or Kundabuffer at once transforms it all
into mechanical imagination and dreams.

“Only a person who fully realizes the difficulty of awakening
can understand the necessity of long and hard work
in order to awaken.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 11.1 of In Search of the Miraculous
by Peter Ouspensky


Awakening means Receiving Shocks

“ “Speaking in general,
what is necessary in order to awaken a sleeping person?

A good shock is necessary.

But when a person is fast asleep
one shock is not enough.

A long period of continual shocks is needed.

Consequently there must be somebody
to administer these shocks.

If a person wants to awaken
[then] they must hire somebody who will keep on shaking them for a long time.

But whom can one hire
if everyone is asleep?

A person will hire somebody to wake them up
but this one also falls asleep.

What is the use of such a person?

And a person who can really keep awake
will probably refuse to waste their time in waking others up:
they may have their own much more important work to do.

“There is also the possibility of being awakened
by mechanical means.

A person may be awakened by an alarm clock.

But the trouble is that a person gets accustomed to the alarm clock
far too quickly,
and they cease to hear it.

Many alarm clocks are necessary
and always new ones…”

-Paraphrase from Ch 11.1 of In Search of the Miraculous
by Peter Ouspensky


Rules can Help us to Awaken

In studying Gnostic Psychology we often learn about ‘recommendations’ or even ‘rules’ that are intended to help us in the Work. Let’s understand what these are…

“ “It very often happens that at the beginning of the Work
the members of an [Esoteric] group do not like some or other of the rules.

And they even ask: Can we not work without rules?

Rules seem to them to be an unnecessary constraint on their liberty
or a tiresome formality,
and to be reminded about rules
seems to them
to be ill-will or dissatisfaction
on the part of the instructor.

“In reality rules are the chief and the first help
that people get from the Work.

It stands to reason that rules do not pursue the object of
affording them amusement
or satisfaction
or of making things more easy for people.

Rules pursue a definite aim:
to make people behave as they would behave ‘if they were… [awake]’,
that is, if they remembered themselves
and realized how they ought to behave
• with regard to people outside the Work,
• and to people in the Work…

If they remembered themselves and realized this,
[then] rules would not be necessary for them.

But they are not able to remember themselves
and [do not] understand this at the beginning of Work,
so that rules are indispensable,
although rules can never be
either easy, pleasant, or comfortable.

On the contrary,
rules ought to be
difficult, unpleasant, and uncomfortable;
otherwise they would not answer their purpose.

Rules are the alarm clocks
which wake the sleeping person up.

But the person, opening their eyes for a second,
is indignant with the alarm clock and asks:
Can one not awaken without alarm clocks?

-Paraphrase from Ch 11.1 of In Search of the Miraculous
by Peter Ouspensky


General Rules and Individual Rules

“ “[In the work of an Esoteric Group]
Besides general rules
there are certain individual conditions
which are given to each person separately
and which are generally connected with
their ‘chief fault’, or chief feature.

This requires some explanation.

[Let us remember that]
Every person has a certain feature in their character
which is central.

It is like an axle round which
all their ‘false personality’ revolves.

Everyone’s personal work
must consist in struggling against this chief fault.

This explains why there can be no general rules of Work
and why all systems that attempt to evolve such rules
either lead to nothing or cause harm.

How can there be general rules?
What is useful for one is harmful for another.

One person talks too much;
they must learn to keep silent.

Another person is silent when they ought to talk
and they must learn to talk;
and so it is always and in everything.

General rules for the work of groups
refer to everyone.

Personal directions can only be individual.

[It is very difficult for] a person
to find their own chief feature,
their chief fault, by themselves…”

-Paraphrase from Ch 11.1 of In Search of the Miraculous
by Peter Ouspensky


Working on the Chief Feature or PCPT

“The study of the chief fault
and the struggle against it
constitute, as it were, each person’s individual path,
but the aim must be the same for all.

This aim is the realization of one’s own nothingness.

Only when a person has truly and sincerely
arrived at the conviction
of their own helplessness and nothingness
and only when they feel it constantly,
will they be ready for the next and much more difficult
stages of the work.

“All that has been said up till now
refers to real groups connected with real concrete Work
which in its turn is connected with
what has been called the ‘fourth way’.

But there are many imitation ways,
imitation groups, and imitation work.”

“…In properly organized groups no faith is required;
what is required is simply a little trust
and even that only for a little while,
since the sooner a person begins to verify all they hear
the better it is for them.

“The struggle against the ‘false I’,
against one’s chief feature or chief fault,
is the most important part of the work,
and it must proceed in deeds,
not in words.

For this purpose the instructor often gives each person
definite tasks which require,
in order to carry them out,
the conquest of their chief feature.

When a person carries out these tasks
they struggle with themselves,
they work on themselves.”

If they avoid the tasks,
try not to carry them out,
it means that either they do not want to
or that they cannot work.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 11.1 of In Search of the Miraculous
by Peter Ouspensky


More about the Chief Feature or PCPT

“[However] …not everyone’s chief feature can be [simply] defined.

With some people this feature can be so hidden
beneath different formal manifestations
as to be almost impossible to find.

And then a person can consider themselves as their chief feature…

The false personality of each person
forms (so to speak) “around their chief feature.”

Whenever anyone disagreed
with the definition of their chief feature
given by Gurdjieff [in his esoteric groups],
he always said that the fact that the person disagreed with him
showed that he was right.

“I disagree only with what you say is actually my chief feature,” said one of our people.

“The chief feature which I know in myself
is very much worse.
But I do not dispute that people may see me as you describe.”

…If you accept what I told you as your chief feature
[then] you will understand how people see you.

And if you find a way to struggle with this feature
and to destroy it, that is, to destroy its involuntary manifestation”
(Gurdjieff emphasized these words),
[then] “you will produce on people not the impression that you do now
but any impression you prefer.”

With this began long talks
about the impressions that a person produces on other people
and how one can produce a desirable or an undesirable impression.

Those around a person see their chief feature
however hidden it may be.

Of course they cannot always define it.

But their definitions are often very good
and very near.

Take, for example, nicknames:
Nicknames sometimes define chief features very well.

The talk about impressions
brought us once more to “inner” and “outward considering.”

“There cannot be proper outward considering
while a person is seated in their chief feature,” said G.

“For instance So-and-So” (he named one of our party).

“His feature is that he is never at home.
How can he consider anything or anybody?”

I was astonished at the artistic finish of the feature
that was represented by G.

It was not psychology even,
it was art.

“And psychology ought to be art,” G. replied,
“psychology can never be simply a science.”

To another of our party he said on the question of feature
that his feature was that he did not exist at all.

“You understand, I do not see you,” said G.
“It does not mean that you are always like that.
But when you are like you are now,
you do not exist at all.”

He said to another that his chief feature was
a tendency always to argue with everybody about everything.

“But then I never argue,”
the man very heatedly at once replied.
Nobody could help laughing.

G. told another of our party
that his feature was that he had no conscience.

The following day the man came and said that he had been in the public library
and had looked through the encyclopedic dictionaries of four languages
for the meaning of the word “conscience.”

G. merely waved his hand.

To the other man…
G. said that he had no shame,
and he at once cracked a rather amusing joke
against himself.

-Paraphrase from Ch 13.2 of In Search of the Miraculous
by Peter Ouspensky


The Chief Feature

“We have to recognize with complete clarity that that each person has
their [Chief Feature or] Particular Characteristic Psychological Trait (PCPT).

Some will have lust as their characteristic trait,
others will have hatred,
for others it will be covetousness, etc.

The trait is the sum of several
particular characteristic psychological elements.

For each PCPT,
a definite event, a precise circumstance,
always exists.

Is a man lustful?
There will always be circumstances of lust in his life
accompanied with specific problems.

These circumstances are always repeated.

We need to know our PCPT
if we want to move on to a superior Level of the Being
and eliminate from ourselves the undesirable elements
which constitute the psychological trait.

…The level of the worthy and modest woman is one level
and the unworthy and immodest woman is another level.

There are different levels of the Being.

Have we noticed our own level of Being,
the level of the Being where we are?

Are we conscious that we are hypnotized and asleep?”

-Paraphrase from Ch 1.31 in The Revolution of the Dialectic [La Revolucion de la Dialectica]
by Samael Aun Weor


Collective Hypnosis and the Work

“All human beings are extremely mechanical,
they are unconscious beings working with their consciousness asleep
without knowing where they come from,
or where they are going;
they are profoundly hypnotized.

The hypnosis (which is collective and flows in all of nature)
is derived from the abominable Kundartiguador organ.

The human race is hypnotized, unconscious, and submerged
in the most profound psychological sleep.

The intellectual animals become identified
not only with external things [Objects],
but they also go around identified with themselves [Subjects],
• with their lustful thoughts,
• with their drunken sprees,
• with their anger,
• with their covetousness,
• with their self-importance,
• with their vanity,
• with mystical pride,
• with self-merit, etc.

Have we, perhaps, reflected
that we have not only become identified with the exterior
but also with vanity and pride?

For example:
• Did we triumph today?
• Did we triumph over the day
or did the day triumph over us?
Are we certain that we did not become identified
with a morbid, covetous, proud thought,
with an insult or a preoccupation or a debt, etc.?

Are we sure that we triumphed over the day
or did the day triumph over us?

What did we do today?

Have we noticed the Level of the Being in which we are?”

-Paraphrase from Ch 1.31 in The Revolution of the Dialectic [La Revolucion de la Dialectica]
by Samael Aun Weor


Do We Want to Change?

“Did we move on to a superior Level of the Being or did we remain where we were?

Can we perhaps believe that it is possible
to move on to a superior Level of the Being
if we do not eliminate specific psychological defects?

Are we perhaps content with the Level of the Being
in which we presently find ourselves?

If we are going to remain our entire life in one level of the Being,
then, what are we doing?

In each level of the Being there are
• specific bitternesses,
• specific sufferings,
that is obvious.

Everyone complains
• that they suffer,
• that they have problems,
• of the state they are in
• and of their struggles.

Therefore, we must ask ourselves,
is the intellectual animal concerned
with moving on to a superior Level of the Being?

Obviously, as long as we are in the Level of the Being in which we are,
all the adverse circumstances that we already know
and all the bitterness in which we are,
will have to be repeated again.

Over and over again,
identical difficulties will surge.

Do we want to [consciously] change?

Do we want to stop having the problems which afflict us,
• economic,
• political,
• social,
• spiritual,
• family,
• lustful problems, etc.?

Do we want to avoid difficulties?
[Then] We have no other solution
but to move on to a superior Level of the Being.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 1.31 in The Revolution of the Dialectic [La Revolucion de la Dialectica]
by Samael Aun Weor


Moving to a Superior Level and Evolution

“Each time that we take a step towards a superior Level of the Being,
we become independent of the Egos that trapped us
in the lower Level of Being.

This is why we need to know our [Chief Feature or] PCPT
[because] if we want to move on to a superior Level of the Being
and eliminate from ourselves the undesirable elements which constitute that PCPT,
otherwise, how will we be able to move on to a superior Level of the Being?

The intellectual animal wants to stop suffering
but does nothing to change;
if one does not struggle to move on to a superior Level of the Being,
then how can one change?

Many pseudo-esoterists (sincere people and of good heart)
are bottled up in the dogma of Evolution,
they wait for time to perfect them…

Why? Because such persons do nothing to change the Level of the Being,
they always remain on the same rung.

Therefore, we need to go beyond Evolution
and enter the Revolutionary path,
the path of the Revolution of the Consciousness.

Evolution and involution are two laws
which are simultaneously processed in all of creation,
they constitute the mechanical axis of nature
but they will never lead us to liberation.

The laws of Evolution and involution are purely material
and have nothing to do with the inner Self-Realization of the Being.

We need to be revolutionary,
we need to enter the path of the Revolution of the Consciousness.

How could we move on to a superior Level of the Being
if we were not revolutionary?

Each Level of the Being has a specific number of activities
that belong to it.

When one moves to a higher Level of the Being,
one has to take a leap
and abandon all the activities
one had in the inferior Level of the Being.

If one moves to a superior Level of the Being,
one has to leave behind many things which are presently important to us,
which belong to the level in which we are.

The transition to another Level of the Being includes, therefore,
a leap and that leap is rebellious,
it is never of an evolving type,
it is always revolutionary, dialectic.

To be full of oneself,
to have false images of oneself,
fantasies of oneself,
is to be in inferior Levels of the Being.

[This means that] One is identified with oneself thinking that
• one is going to have a lot of money, a beautiful, latest model car
• or that their fiancée loves them,
• that one is a great person or a sage, etc.

There are many forms of becoming identified with oneself.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 1.31 in The Revolution of the Dialectic [La Revolucion de la Dialectica]
by Samael Aun Weor


Forgiving Debts

“One has to begin by not becoming identified with oneself [Subject],
and then, not becoming identified with things outside of oneself [Objects].

When, for example, one does not become identified with an offender,
one forgives them, loves them, [then] the offender cannot hurt us;
and if someone hurts our self-esteem,
but we do not become identified with self-esteem,
[then] it is therefore clear that we cannot feel any pain
since it does not hurt us.

If one does not become identified with vanity,
one does not care about walking on the street
[regardless of what one is wearing or how far one has to walk].
Why? Because one is not identified with vanity.

If we (first of all) become identified with ourselves [Subject]
and then with the vanities of the exterior world [Object],
then we cannot forgive;
let us remember the Lord’s prayer:
“Forgive us our debts
as we forgive our debtors…”

It is not enough to simply forgive,
but we also have to cancel the debts.

Someone could forgive an enemy
but would never ever cancel the debts.

However, we have to be sincere,
we need to cancel [those debts]…

-Paraphrase from Ch 1.31 in The Revolution of the Dialectic [La Revolucion de la Dialectica]
by Samael Aun Weor


Resentment, Debts, Accounts and Authentic Happiness vs Self-Esteem

The Lord’s Gospel also says:
“Blessed are the meek for they will inherit the earth…”

This is a phrase that almost no one has understood.
Blessed are, we should say, the non-resentful.

If one is resentful,
how could one be meek?

The resentful person lives keeping count:
“And I who did him so many favors… I protected him,
I did so many deeds of charity for him
and look at how this friend has paid me back
(when I have helped him so much
and now he is incapable of helping me)!”

This is the “accounting” of the resentful.

How could one be meek
if one is full of resentments?

The one who is full of resentments
lives keeping count at all times,
therefore, they are not meek.
So, how could they be blessed?

To be happy is very difficult,
for that, one first of all needs to be meek.

…If we truly become meek through non-identification,
we will then get to be happy.

But it is necessary not only to
not become identified with our thoughts of
lust, hatred, vengeance, animosity, resentment,
but also to eliminate from ourselves the Red Demons of Set,
those psychic aggregates which personify our defects of a psychological type.

We have to comprehend, for example,
what the process of resentment is,
we have to dissect resentment.

When one arrives at the conclusion that resentment
comes from possessing self-esteem in our interior,
we then struggle to eliminate the “I” of self-esteem.

But we have to comprehend it
in order to be able to eliminate it,
we could not eliminate it
if we have not previously comprehended it.

In order to be able to eliminate
one needs Devi Kundalini Shakti,
it is only she who can disintegrate any psychological defect
including the “I” of self-esteem.

Are we sure that we are not resentful towards someone?

If we want to become independent from lunar mechanicity,
[then] we have to eliminate from ourselves
the “I” of resentment and of self-esteem.

When one understands this,
one advances on the path which leads to final Liberation.

It is only by means of the fire
• of Aries, the Lamb,
• of the incarnated Ram,
• of the inner Christ,
that we can truly burn those inhuman elements
which we carry in our interior;
[and] as the consciousness becomes unbottled,
we will awaken.

Consciousness cannot awaken
as long as it continues bottled up within psychic aggregates…

We need to undergo Mystical Death here and now.

We need to die from instant to instant;
it is only with death that the new arrives.

If the germ does not die,
the plant is not born.

We need to learn how to live,
in order to liberate ourselves
from that lunar heredity that we have.”

-Paraphrase from Ch 1.31 in The Revolution of the Dialectic [La Revolucion de la Dialectica]
by Samael Aun Weor